Current:Home > StocksFederal Appeals Court Reverses Approval of Massive LNG Export Plants in South Texas-DB Wealth Institute B2 Expert Reviews
Federal Appeals Court Reverses Approval of Massive LNG Export Plants in South Texas
View Date:2024-12-23 14:55:59
For the second time, a federal court struck down a regulatory agency’s authorization of two controversial, multi-billion-dollar gas export projects in far South Texas, one of which is already under construction.
In an Aug. 6 opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Washington, D.C. Circuit cited “the nature and severity of the flaws” in reviews by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission of the two proposed gas liquefaction and export complexes, Rio Grande LNG and Texas LNG, along with the associated Rio Bravo Pipeline.
“Although we do not take this step lightly, the circumstances here require it,” the ruling said. “We appreciate the significant disruption vacatur may cause the projects. But that does not outweigh the seriousness of the Commission’s procedural defects.”
The court wrote that FERC failed in its analyses of environmental justice and climate impacts, air pollution modeling and procedural obligations. FERC and the developers now have 45 days to seek a re-hearing.
Explore the latest news about what’s at stake for the climate during this election season.
The two complexes in question plan to pipe in Texas shale gas, condense it and load millions of tons per year onto tanker ships for sale overseas as liquified natural gas, or LNG. Each complex costs billions of dollars, spans hundreds of acres and makes up part of an ongoing boom in gas export projects along the Gulf Coast of Texas and Louisiana.
Rio Grande LNG parent company NextDecade said in a statement it was “disappointed in the Court’s decision and disagrees with its conclusions.”
The company added that construction continues on the first three liquefaction trains and related infrastructure at Rio Grande LNG near Brownsville and it will examine what impact the court’s order will have on future plans for added infrastructure.
The company announced last July it had secured investor funding to begin construction on its 750-acre, $18 billion facility.
A spokesperson for Texas LNG, a smaller, adjacent project on the Brownsville Ship Channel that is yet to secure sufficient funding, said the ruling was a procedural decision to correct a technical deficiency, which they were still studying.
“We have full confidence FERC will address this matter judiciously and efficiently and look forward to working with them on this important issue,” the spokesperson said in a statement.
Three small surrounding cities and the local water district have passed resolutions opposing the projects, situated between national wildlife refuges and atop wetlands.
“Port Isabel and the other communities of the Laguna Madre area are located in one of the most unique, pristine and scenic ecosystems in the world,” said a 2023 resolution by the City of Port Isabel, a party in the lawsuit against FERC. “The proposed project area is located in a delicate and partially undisturbed salt flat.”
The Carrizo/Comecrudo Tribe of Texas, also a party in the lawsuit, has led a yearslong campaign against the destruction of archaeological sites on land that it considers sacred.
“The issue is what they’re doing to continually try to decimate who we are as a people,” said Juan Mancias, chairman of the tribe.
Mancias said Tuesday’s ruling made him proud to be Carrizo/Comecrudo and felt it gave the tribe a say in what happened to the land.
“I’m glad they made the decision that they made, because that decision says a lot about what is lacking in this process of permitting,” he said.
But the projects have unanimous support from the Cameron County commissioners, based in nearby Brownsville, and from most local politicians. Neither Cameron County Judge Eddie Treviño Jr. nor any of the four county commissioners responded to requests for comment.
A FERC spokesperson said the agency does not comment on court issues.
“FERC is a regulator that historically has relied upon industry assurances when making its decisions,” said Tyson Slocum, energy program director at Public Citizen in Washington. “Unfortunately, industry often is wrong, and frequently minimizes potential hazards and risks posed to the community.”
Todd Staples, president of the Texas Oil and Gas Association, said, “Delaying approvals and treating natural gas as a liability rather than an asset squanders our nation’s global energy leadership and forces our allies to look to other nations—some of which are hostile to America—to meet their energy needs.”
Years of Litigation
Tuesday’s ruling was the second time the court struck down FERC’s authorization of these projects in response to petitions from local groups supported by nonprofit environmental lawyers at the Sierra Club.
The first time, in August 2021, the court ruled FERC failed to assess impacts of the projects’ enormous greenhouse gas emissions and had picked an arbitrary two-mile radius within which to conduct its environmental justice analysis. The court also said the projects modeled their air pollution using data from a faraway air monitor in Brownsville instead of the closer Isla Blanca monitor, and asked the commission to reconsider its finding that the projects were in the public interest.
In subsequent analysis, FERC calculated the “social cost of carbon,” a measure of the estimated future financial impacts created by releasing greenhouse gases today, from Rio Grande LNG and the Rio Bravo Pipeline at $20 billion. The two projects would create 3.6 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent during construction and 7.3 million tons every year thereafter.
After the court’s 2021 order, Rio Grande LNG opted to add a carbon capture system to its design that would inject greenhouse gases underground instead of releasing them into the air.
FERC also increased its environmental justice review area from two to 31 miles, then re-authorized both projects in April 2023.
“It was clear FERC was just rushing through this to give these LNG companies what they wanted at the expense of our community,” said Bekah Hinojosa, founder of the South Texas Environmental Justice Network, who has been fighting the projects since 2015. “It’s a broken process.”
The groups sued again, alleging FERC sloppily rushed through the requirements in the court’s original order without following proper procedure. In its latest ruling, the federal appeals court in Washington agreed.
It wrote that FERC failed to issue written statements of its updated environmental justice analysis, to conduct a review of Rio Grande LNG’s carbon capture project or to make those documents available for a public comment period as required by law. It did, however, submit them for comment to the LNG companies.
“Because the comment period was limited to the developers’ responses, the public was not able to comment on the Commission’s analysis of those responses,” the ruling said. “We do not see how the Commission could justify its decision to skip those fundamental procedural steps.”
According to Nathan Matthews, senior attorney for the Sierra Club, FERC and the developers have 45 days to seek a re-hearing. Seven days after that, the court mandate takes effect and construction at the facilities must stop.
“But FERC doesn’t need to wait for the court,” Matthews said, citing the Mountain Valley Pipeline in 2018, when FERC stopped work without waiting for a court mandate. “FERC should do the same here.”
About This Story
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
Thank you,
David Sassoon
Founder and Publisher
Vernon Loeb
Executive Editor
Share this article
veryGood! (6231)
Related
- Mean Girls’ Lacey Chabert Details “Full Circle” Reunion With Lindsay Lohan and Amanda Seyfried
- Real Housewives of Atlanta's Drew Sidora and Ralph Pittman Divorcing After 8 Years of Marriage
- Proof Gwyneth Paltrow and Chris Martin Are Still Hollywood's Most Amicable Exes
- As Congress eyes a TikTok ban, what could happen to the social media platform?
- Tennis Channel suspends reporter after comments on Barbora Krejcikova's appearance
- Couple work to unearth secrets of lost Mayan civilization
- Pregnant The Ultimatum Star April Marie Reveals Sex of First Baby With Cody Cooper
- Michelin-Starred Chef Curtis Stone Shares an Unexpected $4 Ingredient He Loves Cooking With
- Trading wands for whisks, new Harry Potter cooking show brings mess and magic
- Transcript: Rep. Patrick McHenry on Face the Nation, March 19, 2023
Ranking
- Denzel Washington Will Star in Black Panther 3 Before Retirement
- Rickey Smiley Shares Suspected Cause of 32-Year-Old Son Brandon's Death
- Hoda Kotb Reflects on Daughter Hope's Really Scary Health Journey After ICU Stay
- 14-year-old boy dubbed El Chapito arrested for 8 drug-related murders in Mexico
- Jenn Tran's Ex Devin Strader Throws Shade At Her DWTS Partner Sasha Farber Amid Romance Rumors
- Rubio says Russian jet collision with U.S. drone was deliberate effort and direct test of Biden administration
- Aubrey O'Day Shares She Suffered a Miscarriage
- Teen allegedly shoots his mom, then kills 2 police officers in Canada
Recommendation
-
Just Eat Takeaway sells Grubhub for $650 million, just 3 years after buying the app for $7.3 billion
-
Rachael Ray Show Is Ending After 17 Seasons
-
Trump White House failed to report 117 foreign gifts and some are missing, House Democrats say
-
Shop Our Coachella & Stagecoach 2023 Fashion Trend Forecast
-
CFP bracket prediction: SEC adds a fifth team to field while a Big Ten unbeaten falls out
-
Australia reptile catcher finds 6-foot-long, highly venomous snake lying in bed looking at me
-
Australia reptile catcher finds 6-foot-long, highly venomous snake lying in bed looking at me
-
Get 3 Pairs of Baublebar Earrings for $12 and More Disney Jewelry Deals