Current:Home > MySpecial counsel Jack Smith asks Supreme Court to rule quickly on whether Trump can be prosecuted-DB Wealth Institute B2 Expert Reviews
Special counsel Jack Smith asks Supreme Court to rule quickly on whether Trump can be prosecuted
View Date:2024-12-23 19:07:21
WASHINGTON (AP) — Special counsel Jack Smith on Monday asked the Supreme Court to take up and rule quickly on whether former President Donald Trump can be prosecuted on charges he plotted to overturn the 2020 election results.
A federal judge ruled the case could go forward, but Trump, 2024 Republican presidential primary front-runner, signaled he would ask the federal appeals court in Washington to reverse that outcome.
Smith is attempting to bypass the appeals court. The request filed Monday for the Supreme Court to take up the matter directly reflects Smith’s desire to keep the trial, currently set for March 4, on track and to prevent any delays that could push back the case until after next year’s presidential election.
“This case presents a fundamental question at the heart of our democracy: whether a former President is absolutely immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office or is constitutionally protected from federal prosecution when he has been impeached but not convicted before the criminal proceedings begin,” prosecutors wrote.
The earliest the court would consider the appeal would be Jan. 5, 2024, the date of the justices’ next scheduled private conference.
Underscoring the urgency for prosecutors in securing a quick resolution that can push the case forward, they wrote: “It is of imperative public importance that respondent’s claims of immunity be resolved by this Court and that respondent’s trial proceed as promptly as possible if his claim of immunity is rejected.”
At issue is a Dec. 1 ruling from U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan that rejected arguments by Trump’s lawyers that he was immune from federal prosecution. In her order, Chutkan, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, wrote that the office of the president “does not confer a lifelong ‘get-out-of-jail-free’ pass.”
“Former Presidents enjoy no special conditions on their federal criminal liability,” Chutkan wrote. “Defendant may be subject to federal investigation, indictment, prosecution, conviction, and punishment for any criminal acts undertaken while in office.”
If the justices get involved, they would have an opportunity to rule for the first time ever on whether ex-presidents enjoy immunity from prosecution. Justice Department policy prohibits the indictment of a sitting president. Though there’s no such bar against prosecution for a former commander in chief, lawyers for Trump say that he cannot be charged for actions that fell within his official duties as president — a claim that prosecutors have vigorously rejected.
Smith’s team stressed that if the court did not expedite the matter, there would not be an opportunity to consider and resolve the question in the current term.
“The United States recognizes that this is an extraordinary request. This is an extraordinary case,” prosecutors wrote. “The Court should grant certiorari and set a briefing schedule that would permit this case to be argued and resolved as promptly as possible.”
Prosecutors are also asking the court to take up Trump’s claim, also already rejected by Chutkan, that he cannot be prosecuted in court for conduct for which he was was already impeached — and acquitted — before Congress.
Trump faces charges accusing him of working to overturn the results of the 2020 election he lost to Democrat Joe Biden before the violent riot by his supporters at the U.S. Capitol. He has denied any wrongdoing.
A Supreme Court case usually lasts several months, from the time the justices agree to hear it until a final decision. Smith is asking the court to move with unusual, but not unprecedented, speed.
Nearly 50 years ago, the justices acted within two months of being asked to force President Richard Nixon to turn over Oval Office recordings in the Watergate scandal. The tapes were then used later in 1974 in the corruption prosecutions of Nixon’s former aides.
It took the high court just a few days to effectively decide the 2000 presidential election for Republican George W. Bush over Democrat Al Gore.
veryGood! (31687)
Related
- High-scoring night in NBA: Giannis Antetokounmpo explodes for 59, Victor Wembanyama for 50
- Jamie Lee Curtis Reunites With Lindsay Lohan to Tease the Ultimate Freaky Friday Sequel
- 'Half American' explores how Black WWII servicemen were treated better abroad
- This physics professor ran 3,000 miles across America in record time
- Sydney Sweeney Slams Women Empowerment in the Industry as Being Fake
- Australian Mom Dies After Taking Ozempic to Lose Weight for Daughter's Wedding
- Astronaut Frank Borman, commander of the first Apollo mission to the moon, has died at age 95
- Yellen says her talks with Chinese finance chief laid groundwork for Biden’s meeting with Xi
- RHOP's Candiace Dillard Bassett Gives Birth, Shares First Photos of Baby Boy
- The Best Fleece-Lined Leggings of 2023 to Wear This Winter, According to Reviewers
Ranking
- Fantasy football waiver wire: 10 players to add for NFL Week 11
- 'Half American' explores how Black WWII servicemen were treated better abroad
- Arab American comic Dina Hashem has a debut special — but the timing is 'tricky'
- How to watch 2023 NWSL championship: Megan Rapinoe and Ali Krieger face off in farewell
- Lions find way to win, Bears in tough spot: Best (and worst) from NFL Week 10
- Shania Twain Speaks Out After Very Scary Tour Bus Crash
- Pakistani police cracking down on migrants are arresting Afghan women and children, activists claim
- Mavericks to play tournament game on regular floor. Production issues delayed the new court
Recommendation
-
Prosecutor failed to show that Musk’s $1M-a-day sweepstakes was an illegal lottery, judge says
-
Mavericks to play tournament game on regular floor. Production issues delayed the new court
-
2024 Grammy nomination snubs and surprises: No K-pop, little country and regional Mexican music
-
Pakistani police cracking down on migrants are arresting Afghan women and children, activists claim
-
Women suing over Idaho’s abortion ban describe dangerous pregnancies, becoming ‘medical refugees’
-
Kenya doomsday cult leader found guilty of illegal filming, but yet to be charged over mass deaths
-
John Bailey, who presided over the film academy during the initial #MeToo reckoning, dies at 81
-
What the Melting of Antarctic Ice Shelves Means for the Planet