Current:Home > MarketsTexas asks court to decide if the state’s migrant arrest law went too far-DB Wealth Institute B2 Expert Reviews
Texas asks court to decide if the state’s migrant arrest law went too far
View Date:2024-12-23 20:18:03
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — An attorney defending Texas’ plans to arrest migrants who enter the U.S. illegally told a panel of federal judges Wednesday that it’s possible the law “went too far” but that will be up to the court to decide.
The comment was made to a 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel that has already previously halted Republican Gov. Greg Abbott’s strict immigration measure. Similar proposals that would allow local police to arrest migrants are now moving through other GOP-led statehouses, including many far from the U.S.-Mexico border.
Texas was allowed to enforce the law for only a few confusing hours last month before it was put on hold by the same three-judge panel that heard arguments Wednesday. No arrests were announced during that brief window.
“What Texas has done here is they have looked at the Supreme Court’s precedent and they have tried to develop a statute that goes up to the line of Supreme Court precedent but no further,” Texas Solicitor General Aaron Nielson said. “Now, to be fair, maybe Texas went too far and that is the question this court is going to have to decide.”
The panel did not indicate whether it believed Texas has overstepped but later questioned Nielson about the specifics and application of the law.
During the hourlong hearing in New Orleans, the Justice Department argued that Texas was trying to usurp the federal government’s authority over immigration enforcement. Texas, however, insisted it would work with the federal government.
The law, known as SB4, allows any Texas law enforcement officer to arrest people suspected of entering the country illegally. Once in custody, migrants could either agree to a Texas judge’s order to leave the U.S. or be prosecuted on misdemeanor charges of illegal entry. Migrants who don’t leave could face arrest again under more serious felony charges.
Asked how the state would enforce judges’ orders for migrants to return to the country from which they entered the U.S. illegally, Nielson said they would be turned over to federal officials at ports of entry. He then stumbled to explain how that is different from what is happening at the border now. At one point, Chief Judge Priscilla Richman questioned what, then, the provision accomplished.
Daniel Tenny, an attorney representing the U.S. government, said the state was attempting to “rewrite Texas SB4 from the podium with regard to the removal provision.”
Richman, an appointee of Republican President George W. Bush, previously ruled in favor of temporarily halting the law.
Judge Andrew Oldham, who was appointed by President Donald Trump and previously opposed the stop, suggested each provision of the law should be scrutinized to determine which, if any, are preempted by federal mandates. Oldham also posed scenarios to attorneys for the federal government of how elements of the law could play out.
“If the court is persuaded that the criminal provisions of SB4 are preempted by federal law, as it indicated it was likely to do in the stay opinion, then really nothing that was said about the removal provisions matters,” Tenny said.
Abbott and other Republicans who approved the law say it’s necessary because President Joe Biden’s administration is not doing enough to prevent illegal border crossings. Justice Department officials have said it would create chaos in the enforcement of immigration law and affect foreign relations.
In the panel’s 2-1 decision last month, Richman cited a 2012 Supreme Court decision that struck down portions of a strict Arizona immigration law, including arrest power. Opponents of the Texas law have said it is the most dramatic attempt by a state to police immigration since that Arizona law.
The panel’s March 19 ruling came hours after the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for the Texas law to take effect. The high court, however, did not rule on the merits of the law and sent the case back to the appeals court for further proceedings.
veryGood! (625)
Related
- Two 'incredibly rare' sea serpents seen in Southern California waters months apart
- Ford lays off 330 more factory workers because of UAW strike expansion
- Who are college football's most overpaid coaches? Hint: SEC leads the way.
- Why oust McCarthy? What Matt Gaetz has said about his motivations to remove the speaker of the House
- Study finds Wisconsin voters approved a record number of school referenda
- Hungary’s foreign minister hints that Budapest will continue blocking EU military aid to Ukraine
- 3 Filipino fishermen die in South China Sea after their boat is hit by a passing commercial vessel
- Peso Pluma talks shaking up music, already having a legacy at 24: 'This is global'
- Wisconsin authorities believe kayaker staged his disappearance and fled to Europe
- 11-Year-Old Football Player Arrested for Allegedly Shooting 2 Teens
Ranking
- Republican Gabe Evans ousts Democratic US Rep. Yadira Caraveo in Colorado
- How to enter $1 million competition for recording extraterrestrial activity on a Ring device
- Cats among mammals that can emit fluorescence, new study finds
- Elon Musk is being sued for libel for accusing a man of having neo-Nazi links
- Some women are stockpiling Plan B and abortion pills. Here's what experts have to say.
- Washington National Cathedral unveils new stained glass windows with racial justice theme
- Mauricio Umansky Reacts to Explosive RHOBH Trailer Amid Kyle Richards Marriage Troubles
- Review: Marvel's 'Loki' returns for a scrappy, brain-spinning Season 2 to save time itself
Recommendation
-
Why Game of Thrones' Maisie Williams May Be Rejoining the George R.R. Martin Universe
-
Hunter Biden pleads not guilty at arraignment on felony gun charges
-
It's dumb to blame Taylor Swift for Kansas City's struggles against the Jets
-
When is the big emergency alert test? Expect your phone to ominously blare Wednesday.
-
Stock market today: Asian shares meander, tracking Wall Street’s mixed finish as dollar surges
-
'What in the Flintstones go to Jurassic Park' is this Zillow Gone Wild featured home?
-
Tracking the challenges facing Ukrainian grain, all the way from farm to table
-
Suspect in police beating has ruptured kidney, headaches; his attorneys call for a federal probe