Current:Home > BackAssailants in latest ship attack near Yemen were likely Somali, not Houthi rebels, Pentagon says-DB Wealth Institute B2 Expert Reviews
Assailants in latest ship attack near Yemen were likely Somali, not Houthi rebels, Pentagon says
View Date:2025-01-09 21:41:49
WASHINGTON (AP) — The five armed assailants captured by U.S. forces after seizing a commercial ship near Yemen over the weekend were likely Somali and not Iranian-backed Houthi rebels, the Pentagon said Monday.
Recent attacks on commercial vessels have been conducted by Houthis, seen as part of a rise in violence in the region due to the Israel-Hamas war.
While the Pentagon was still assessing the motives of the latest group, “we know they are not Houthi,” Pentagon press secretary Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder told reporters. He didn’t rule out that the rebels were somehow linked to the attack.
While piracy in the region is down, this “was clearly a piracy-related event,” Ryder said.
Yemen’s internationally recognized government in Aden had accused the Houthis of attacking the MV Central Park in the Gulf of Aden on Sunday.
The Liberian-flagged tanker, managed by Zodiac Maritime, sent out a distress call and forces from the USS Mason, an American destroyer, responded.
The five assailants attempted to flee in their small boats, but the U.S. forces pursued them and fired warning shots, “resulting in their eventual surrender,” Ryder said. They were being held aboard the Mason, he said.
However, a little over 90 minutes later, two ballistic missiles fired from Houthi-controlled Yemen landed about 10 nautical miles (18 nautical kilometers) from the Mason. The U.S. destroyer did not engage or try to intercept the missiles because they were not deemed a threat and splashed into the water, Ryder said.
He said it was still not clear whether the ballistic missiles were aiming for the Mason.
Ryder said there were three Chinese vessels in the area at the time but they did not respond to the Central Park’s distress call. The Chinese government has not acknowledged whether it had ships in the area at the time of the attack. According to international maritime law, any ship in the vicinity is required to respond to a distress call.
veryGood! (9961)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Take the Day Off
- Prince Harry Absent From Royal Family Balcony Moment at King Charles III’s Coronation
- Artificial intelligence could soon diagnose illness based on the sound of your voice
- Tucker Carlson debuts his Twitter show: No gatekeepers here
- Contained, extinguished and mopping up: Here’s what some common wildfire terms mean
- 24 Mother’s Day Gifts From Amazon That Look Way More Expensive Than They Actually Are
- Today’s Climate: July 7, 2010
- A public payphone in China began ringing and ringing. Who was calling?
- Inside Dream Kardashian's Sporty 8th Birthday Party
- 24 Luxury Mother's Day Gifts to Pamper Mom
Ranking
- Florida man’s US charges upgraded to killing his estranged wife in Spain
- Prince Harry Absent From Royal Family Balcony Moment at King Charles III’s Coronation
- Why were the sun and moon red Tuesday? Wildfire smoke — here's how it recolors the skies
- What Will Be the Health Impact of 100+ Days of Exposure to California’s Methane Leak?
- A crowd of strangers brought 613 cakes and then set out to eat them
- CNN chief executive Chris Licht has stepped down
- John Hickenlooper on Climate Change: Where the Candidate Stands
- 24 Mother’s Day Gifts From Amazon That Look Way More Expensive Than They Actually Are
Recommendation
-
Bowl projections: SEC teams joins College Football Playoff field
-
Today’s Climate: June 28, 2010
-
Today’s Climate: June 22, 2010
-
Botched Smart Meter Roll Outs Provoking Consumer Backlash
-
Former NFL coach Jack Del Rio charged with operating vehicle while intoxicated
-
House GOP rules vote on gas stoves goes up in flames
-
The Iron Sheik, wrestling legend, dies at age 81
-
These LSD-based drugs seem to help mice with anxiety and depression — without the trip