Current:Home > StocksNorth Dakota Supreme Court ruling keeps the state's abortion ban on hold for now-DB Wealth Institute B2 Expert Reviews
North Dakota Supreme Court ruling keeps the state's abortion ban on hold for now
View Date:2024-12-23 21:32:52
BISMARCK, N.D. — The North Dakota Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a state abortion ban will remain blocked while a lawsuit over its constitutionality proceeds.
The ban was designed to take effect once the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. But a district judge had put it on hold this summer while the Red River Women's Clinic (RRWC) pursued a lawsuit arguing the state constitution protected a right to an abortion.
"While the regulation of abortion is within the authority of the legislature under the North Dakota Constitution, RRWC has demonstrated likely success on the merits that there is a fundamental right to an abortion in the limited instances of life-saving and health-preserving circumstances, and the statute is not narrowly tailored to satisfy strict scrutiny," Chief Justice Jon J. Jensen wrote in the ruling.
The law — one of many abortion-restricting measures passed by state legislatures in anticipation of the high court's decision — includes exceptions to save the life of the mother and in cases of rape or incest.
The Red River Women's Clinic — the state's only abortion clinic — shut its doors this summer and moved operations a short distance from Fargo to Moorhead, Minnesota, where abortion remains legal. But the clinic's owner is still pursuing the lawsuit.
"The court made the right decision and sided with the people of North Dakota today," clinic director Tammi Kromenaker said in a statement. "Those seeking abortion care know what's best for themselves and their families and should be able to access such essential services if and when they need it. While I'm heartbroken that we have been forced to close our doors here in Fargo, we will continue to serve the region at our new clinic in Moorhead, Minnesota."
Messages left with the office of North Dakota Attorney General Drew Wrigley were not immediately returned Thursday.
Wrigley had argued the ban should be enforced while the lawsuit proceeds, saying Burleigh County District Judge Bruce Romanick erred by granting the injunction. Romanick has said that the Red River Women's Clinic had a "substantial probability" of succeeding in its lawsuit, but also said there's no "clear and obvious answer" on whether the state constitution conveys a right to abortion.
Attorneys for the clinic had argued that Romanick's decision to block the ban was proper.
When Romanick blocked the law from taking effect, he acknowledged that the clinic had moved but noted that doctors and hospitals would still be affected by the statute. Under the law, a doctor who performs an abortion would be charged with a felony and then have to prove the procedure was done in cases of either rape or incest or to save the mother's life.
Lawyers for the clinic said the ban and its rules on affirmative defenses may make doctors hesitant "from performing abortions even in a life-threatening situation."
Since the U.S. Supreme Court in June overturned Roe v. Wade, the ruling that protected the right to abortion for nearly five decades, abortion restrictions have been up to states and the landscape has shifted quickly.
Thirteen states are now enforcing bans on abortion at any point in pregnancy and one more — Georgia — bans it once cardiac activity can be detected, or at about six weeks' gestation.
Courts have put on hold enforcement of abortion bans or deep restrictions in Arizona, Indiana, Montana, Ohio, South Carolina, Utah and Wyoming. Idaho courts have forced the state to allow abortions during medical emergencies.
veryGood! (96)
Related
- Watch out, Temu: Amazon Haul, Amazon's new discount store, is coming for the holidays
- The federal spending bill will make it easier to save for retirement. Here's how
- Video: Regardless of Results, Kentucky’s Primary Shows Environmental Justice is an Issue for Voters
- Gunman on scooter charged with murder after series of NYC shootings that killed 86-year-old man and wounded 3 others
- Brands Our Editors Are Thankful For in 2024
- Farmworkers brace for more time in the shadows after latest effort fails in Congress
- 2022 was the year crypto came crashing down to Earth
- Environmental Groups Don’t Like North Carolina’s New Energy Law, Despite Its Emission-Cutting Goals
- Nevada Democrats keep legislative control but fall short of veto-proof supermajority
- Southwest cancels 5,400 flights in less than 48 hours in a 'full-blown meltdown'
Ranking
- Gun groups sue to overturn Maine’s new three-day waiting period to buy firearms
- Fiancée speaks out after ex-boyfriend shoots and kills her husband-to-be: My whole world was taken away
- Fox News' Sean Hannity says he knew all along Trump lost the election
- Britain is seeing a wave of strikes as nurses, postal workers and others walk out
- Tuskegee University closes its campus to the public, fires security chief after shooting
- Coal Is On Its Way Out in Indiana. But What Replaces It and Who Will Own It?
- Fiancée speaks out after ex-boyfriend shoots and kills her husband-to-be: My whole world was taken away
- Texas Justices Hand Exxon Setback in California Climate Cases
Recommendation
-
Inflation ticked up in October, CPI report shows. What happens next with interest rates?
-
Cultivated meat: Lab-grown meat without killing animals
-
With Sen. Kyrsten Sinema’s Snubbing of the Democrats’ Reconciliation Plans, Environmental Advocates Ask, ‘Which Side Are You On?’
-
With Climate Change Intensifying, Can At-Risk Minority Communities Rely on the Police to Keep Them Safe?
-
Gigi Hadid and Bradley Cooper Prove They're Going Strong With Twinning Looks on NYC Date
-
Everything to Know About the Vampire Breast Lift, the Sister Treatment to the Vampire Facial
-
Harris and Ocasio-Cortez Team up on a Climate ‘Equity’ Bill, Leaving Activists Hoping for Unity
-
On Florida's Gulf Coast, developers eye properties ravaged by Hurricane Ian