Current:Home > NewsSupreme Court rejects challenges to Indian Child Welfare Act, leaving law intact-DB Wealth Institute B2 Expert Reviews
Supreme Court rejects challenges to Indian Child Welfare Act, leaving law intact
View Date:2024-12-23 22:49:29
Washington — The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to disturb a federal law that governs the process for the placement of Native American children in foster or adoptive homes, rejecting constitutional challenges to the law.
The court ruled 7-2 in the case known as Haaland v. Brackeen, which was brought by a birth mother, foster and adoptive parents, and the state of Texas. The challengers claimed the law exceeds federal authority, infringes state sovereignty and discriminates on the basis of race.
In a majority opinion authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the court turned down the challenges, a victory for the Biden administration and several Native American tribes that defended the law.
"The issues are complicated," Barrett wrote, adding that "the bottom line is that we reject all of petitioners' challenges to the statute, some on the merits and others for lack of standing."
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented.
Enacted in 1978, the Indian Child Welfare Act aims to keep Native American children connected to Native families by giving preference to those families or Native institutions during foster care and adoption proceedings that involve Native children. The law defines "Indian child" as not only one who is a member of a Native American tribe, but also one who is eligible for membership and the biological child of a tribal member.
The dispute before the Supreme Court arose from three child custody proceedings, during which the Indian Child Welfare Act was invoked to govern the placement of Native children. The White foster and adoptive parents, joined by the state of Texas, challenged the constitutionality of the law in federal court, arguing in part that it uses racial classifications that unlawfully impede non-Native families from fostering or adopting Native children.
A federal district court ruled in favor of the families, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision that the law's preferences for prioritizing "other Indian families" and "Indian foster home[s]" over non-Native families are unconstitutional. The appeals court also upheld the district court's ruling that several of the law's requirements violated the 10th Amendment.
In a concurring opinion by Justice Neil Gorsuch, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Gorsuch praised the majority opinion upholding the law, and wrote that when enacting it more than 30 years ago, Congress exercised its lawful authority to "secure the right of Indian parents to raise their families as they please; the right of Indian children to grow in their culture; and the right of Indian communities to resist fading into the twilight of history."
"In affirming the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), the Court safeguards the ability of tribal members to raise their children free from interference by state authorities and other outside parties," he wrote. "In the process, the Court also goes a long way toward restoring the original balance between federal, state, and tribal powers the Constitution envisioned."
Thomas, in dissent, said while the Supreme Court's precedents reference a "plenary power" that Congress has over Native American affairs, such a power does not derive from any constitutional basis.
"[E]ven taking the Court's precedents as given, there is no reason to extend this 'plenary power' to the situation before us today: regulating state-court child custody proceedings of U. S. citizens, who may never have even set foot on Indian lands, merely because the child involved happens to be an Indian," he wrote.
President Biden cheered the majority's ruling, saying in a statement that he stands "alongside Tribal Nations as they celebrate today's Supreme Court decision."
"Our Nation's painful history looms large over today's decision. In the not-so-distant past, Native children were stolen from the arms of the people who loved them. They were sent to boarding schools or to be raised by non-Indian families — all with the aim of erasing who they are as Native people and tribal citizens. These were acts of unspeakable cruelty that affected generations of Native children and threatened the very survival of Tribal Nations," he said. "The Indian Child Welfare Act was our Nation's promise: never again."
- In:
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Native Americans
- Federal Government of the United States
- Politics
- Indian Child Welfare Act
- United States Federal Government Shutdown of 2018
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Mixed Use
- Expansion of I-45 in Downtown Houston Is on Hold, for Now, in a Traffic-Choked, Divided Region
- Your Super Bowl platter may cost less this year – if you follow these menu twists
- ERs staffed by private equity firms aim to cut costs by hiring fewer doctors
- Olympic champion Lindsey Vonn is ending her retirement at age 40 to make a skiing comeback
- And Just Like That, the Secret to Sarah Jessica Parker's Glowy Skin Revealed
- Renting a home may be more financially prudent than buying one, experts say
- Amazon Prime Day Is Starting Early With This Unreal Deal on the Insignia Fire TV With 5,500+ Rave Reviews
- As US Catholic bishops meet, Trump looms over their work on abortion and immigration
- Bachelor Fans Will Want to Steal Jason Tartick and Kaitlyn Bristowe's Date Night Ideas for a Sec
Ranking
- Groups seek a new hearing on a Mississippi mail-in ballot lawsuit
- Want To Get Ready in 3 Minutes? Beauty Gurus Love This $5 Makeup Stick for Cheeks, Eyes, and Lips
- Why Cynthia Nixon Doesn’t Want Fans to Get Their Hopes Up About Kim Cattrall in And Just Like That
- The debt ceiling, extraordinary measures, and the X Date. Why it all matters.
- Mega Millions winning numbers for November 8 drawing: Jackpot rises to $361 million
- Why Kristin Cavallari Isn't Prioritizing Dating 3 Years After Jay Cutler Breakup
- Stars of Oppenheimer walk out of premiere due to actors' strike
- Compare the election-fraud claims Fox News aired with what its stars knew
Recommendation
-
Wildfire map: Thousands of acres burn near New Jersey-New York border; 1 firefighter dead
-
Bachelor Fans Will Want to Steal Jason Tartick and Kaitlyn Bristowe's Date Night Ideas for a Sec
-
How Kim Kardashian Really Feels About Hater Kourtney Kardashian Amid Feud
-
ERs staffed by private equity firms aim to cut costs by hiring fewer doctors
-
A Pipeline Runs Through It
-
Governor Roy Cooper Led North Carolina to Act on Climate Change. Will That Help Him Win a 2nd Term?
-
Save $155 on a NuFACE Body Toning Device That Smooths Away Cellulite and Firms Skin in 5 Minutes
-
Amazon Shoppers Love This Very Cute & Comfortable Ruffled Top for the Summer