Current:Home > MarketsStop using Miracle Baby Loungers sold on Amazon: Warning issued due to suffocation, fall risk-DB Wealth Institute B2 Expert Reviews
Stop using Miracle Baby Loungers sold on Amazon: Warning issued due to suffocation, fall risk
View Date:2024-12-23 23:23:45
Parents and caretakers who purchased certain baby products on Amazon have been warned to stop using them immediately, according to a notice by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC).
Miracle Baby Loungers sold on Amazon were recently evaluated by CPSC and found to be unsafe and in violation of federal regulations. The design of the loungers paired with improper labeling poses suffocation and fall risks to infants sleeping in them.
The CPSC, which sets the standards for infant sleep products, is therefore advising all consumers who have purchased these products to dispose of them immediately. While the organization is still working on sending direct notice to impacted customers and seeking a remedy from the seller, it appears the risky products are no longer on the brand's Amazon shop.
However, those who already purchased certain items should check the brand and get rid of the products immediately. Read on for more information on what to look for.
Baby loungers recall:Over 4,000 baby loungers sold on Amazon recalled over suffocation, entrapment concerns
Risks of suffocation, fall hazards
The CPSC has said the loungers fail to meet federal safety regulations and specifically violate CPSC’s Infant Sleep Products standards.
The loungers do not have a stand built in as part of their design, creating an unsafe sleeping environment for infants. The design creates an increased risk of suffocation or falls and also lacks proper labeling, said CPSC.
The lounger and its packaging also do not include the required markings and information, such as the date the product was manufactured and proper instructions for safe use.
The loungers are sold only on Amazon by Chinese seller Yichang Lanqier Garment Co. Ltd., which operates on the site under the moniker Miracle Baby. CPSC issued a Notice of Violation to the seller, but the company refused to formally recall the products or offer solutions to customers. Instead, people who purchased the unsafe products will receive a notice from CPSC in the mail.
Check car recalls here:Honda, BMW, and Subaru among 528,000 vehicles recalled
Stop using these Miracle Baby Loungers: How to get rid of the products
CPSC said the baby loungers in question were sold on Amazon between June and November 2022 for $30 to $50.
They have "Miracle Baby" printed on a tag attached to the outside and come in fabric print options New Bear, Bee, Blue Star, Cat, Deer, Elephant, New Blue Star, New Panda, New Pink Star, Pink Cross, Sea, Whale and White Cross.
It is advised that any customer who owns this product stop using and destroy it immediately. CPSC suggested disposing of the faulty loungers by unzipping the cover and cutting up the fabric, along with the accompanying sleeping pad and side bumpers, before disposing of the pieces in a proper trash receptacle.
If you have already witnessed injury or an unsafe situation caused by the product, the organization asks that you report it at www.SaferProducts.gov.
Advice for safe sleep
CPSC likewise issued a brief reminder of some sleep-safe practices for infants, including:
- The best place for an infant to sleep is on a firm, flat surface in a crib, bassinet or play yard.
- Use a fitted sheet only and never add blankets, pillows, padded crib bumpers, or other items to an infant’s sleeping environment.
- Infants should always be placed to sleep on their backs. Infants who fall asleep in an inclined or upright position should be moved to a safe sleep environment with a firm, flat surface such as a crib, bassinet or play yard.
Recalled fruit:1 dead, 10 sick after listeria outbreak linked to recalled peaches, plums and nectarines
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Inspector general finds no fault in Park Police shooting of Virginia man in 2017
- American Airlines plane slides off runway at New York's Rochester Airport
- Rifts emerge among top Israeli officials over how to handle the war against Hamas in Gaza
- Many animals seized from troubled Virginia zoo will not be returned, judge rules
- Dick Van Dyke says he 'fortunately' won't be around for Trump's second presidency
- Microsoft says state-backed Russian hackers accessed emails of senior leadership team members
- Charcuterie sold at Costco and Sam's Club is being linked to a salmonella outbreak
- Dior puts on a daytime fashion ballet under the Parisian stars
- Love Is Blind’s Chelsea Blackwell Reacts to Megan Fox’s Baby News
- She lost 100-pounds but gained it back. The grief surprised her. Now, like others, she's sharing her story.
Ranking
- Olivia Munn Randomly Drug Tests John Mulaney After Mini-Intervention
- El Paso Challenges Oil Refinery Permit
- Malia Obama Makes Red Carpet Debut at Sundance Screening for Her Short Film
- March for Life 2024: Anti-abortion advocates plan protest in nation's capital
- Jamie Lee Curtis and Don Lemon quit X, formerly Twitter: 'Time for me to leave'
- 2023 was the worst year to buy a house since the 1990s. But there's hope for 2024
- California court ruling could threaten key source of funding for disputed giant water tunnel project
- Midwife who gave 1,500 kids homeopathic pellets instead of vaccines put lives in jeopardy, New York health officials say
Recommendation
-
Missouri prosecutor says he won’t charge Nelly after an August drug arrest
-
Do I have to file my taxes? Here's how to know and why you may want to even if you don't.
-
Many animals seized from troubled Virginia zoo will not be returned, judge rules
-
Developers Seek Big Changes to the Mountain Valley Pipeline’s Southgate Extension, Amid Sustained Opposition
-
Texas’ 90,000 DACA recipients can sign up for Affordable Care Act coverage — for now
-
The 1,650th victim of 9/11 was named after 22 years. More than 1,100 remain unidentified.
-
Ousted Florida Republican chair cleared of rape allegation, but police seek video voyeurism charge
-
Your call is very important to us. Is it, really?