Current:Home > MyIndiana high court finds state residents entitled to jury trial in government confiscation cases-DB Wealth Institute B2 Expert Reviews
Indiana high court finds state residents entitled to jury trial in government confiscation cases
View Date:2024-12-23 18:36:02
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — Indiana residents are entitled to a trial by jury when the government seeks to confiscate their money or property through the civil forfeiture process, the state’s high court ruled.
In a 5-0 decision Tuesday, the Indiana Supreme Court found that the history of civil forfeiture proceedings, from medieval England to Indiana statehood, weighs in favor of letting a jury decide whether property allegedly associated with a crime should be seized by the state, The Times of Northwest Indiana reported.
“We hold that a claimant in an action brought under Indiana’s civil forfeiture statute has a constitutional right to trial by jury,” Justice Christopher Goff wrote on behalf of the court.
Tuesday’s ruling also establishes a new test for the jury-trial right contained in Article I, Section 20 of the Indiana Constitution.
The decision stems from a case involving Alucious Kizer, who was convicted in December 2022 of three counts of drug dealing and sentenced to a total of 20 years in state prison.
Kizer, 45, will now have an opportunity to get the jury trial he initially requested more than two years ago to determine whether the $2,435 in cash recovered during his arrest for drug dealing in Allen County should be forfeited.
Kizer was represented before the state Supreme Court by the Virginia-based Institute for Justice, which has repeatedly challenged Indiana’s civil forfeiture laws, including authorities’ seizure of a Land Rover belonging to Tyson Timbs of Marion, Indiana, who was arrested in 2013 for selling $400 in drugs. In that case, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2019 that the U.S. Constitution’s ban on excessive fines applies to the states.
More than two years after the high court’s ruling, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled that Timbs could keep his $35,000 vehicle.
Sam Gedge, the senior attorney for the Institute for Justice, argued Kizer’s case before the Indiana Supreme Court. He said Tuesday that the justices’ unanimous ruling reinforces a fundamental constitutional guarantee.
“The right to a trial by jury of our peers is core to our system of justice. And for centuries, courts across the nation have confirmed the obvious: When the government sues to forfeit your property, you’re entitled to make your case to a jury,” Gedge said.
Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita had argued in Kizer’s case that no right to a jury trial exists under the federal or state constitutions and that a trial by a judge is sufficient, since civil forfeiture of property in Indiana is a purely statutory procedure of relatively modern vintage.
The Associated Press emailed Rokita’s office Wednesday seeking comment.
veryGood! (727)
Related
- Stock market today: Asian shares mostly decline, shrugging off Wall Street’s overnight rally
- Unfamiliar Ground: Bracing for Climate Impacts in the American Midwest
- It's never too late to explore your gender identity. Here's how to start
- Coal Boss Takes Climate Change Denial to the Extreme
- Stock market today: Asian stocks decline as China stimulus plan disappoints markets
- Lily-Rose Depp Makes Rare Comment About Dad Johnny Depp Amid Each of Their Cannes Premieres
- More gay and bisexual men will now be able to donate blood under finalized FDA rules
- Unfamiliar Ground: Bracing for Climate Impacts in the American Midwest
- The results are in: Peanut the Squirrel did not have rabies, county official says
- Assault suspect who allegedly wrote So I raped you on Facebook still on the run 2 years after charges were filed
Ranking
- Mike Tyson-Jake Paul: How to watch the fight, time, odds
- Ariana Madix Shares Surprising Take on Vanderpump Rules' Scandoval Reunion Drama
- Many people living in the 'Diabetes Belt' are plagued with medical debt
- 12 House Republicans Urge Congress to Cut ANWR Oil Drilling from Tax Bill
- Is Kyle Richards Finally Ready to File for Divorce From Mauricio Umansky? She Says...
- In House Bill, Clean Energy on the GOP Chopping Block 13 Times
- Judge Deals Blow to Tribes in Dakota Access Pipeline Ruling
- Damaged section of Interstate 95 to partially reopen earlier than expected following bridge collapse
Recommendation
-
Dick Van Dyke says he 'fortunately' won't be around for Trump's second presidency
-
Deciding when it's time to end therapy
-
German man in bulletproof vest attempts to enter U.S. Embassy in Paraguay, officials say
-
When a prison sentence becomes a death sentence
-
West Virginia expands education savings account program for military families
-
Edgy or insensitive? The Paralympics TikTok account sparks a debate
-
What happened to the missing Titanic sub? Our reporter who rode on vessel explains possible scenarios
-
Germany’s Clean Energy Shift Transformed Industrial City of Hamburg