Current:Home > BackNCAA's proposed $2.8 billion settlement with athletes runs into trouble with federal judge-DB Wealth Institute B2 Expert Reviews
NCAA's proposed $2.8 billion settlement with athletes runs into trouble with federal judge
View Date:2024-12-23 15:42:40
A federal judge in California said Thursday she will not grant preliminary approval to the current version of a proposed multi-billion-dollar settlement of three athlete compensation antitrust cases against the NCAA and the Power Five conferences.
Following a 2½-hour remote hearing, U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken and lawyers for the sides agreed that the parties would get back to her in three weeks with what she termed a "prognosis" for the proposed deal.
While Wilken said "it seems likely enough there will be a settlement," she also raised the prospect that the lawyers may come back to her and "say … give us a trial date."
The NCAA’s lead attorney during Thursday’s hearing, Rakesh Kilaru, said during the session that given Wilken’s concerns, he and the plaintiffs’ lawyers "have to talk about whether we have a deal to talk about."
In addition to providing a nearly $2.8 billion damages pool for current and former athletes over a span of 10 years, the proposed deal would allow Division I schools to start paying athletes directly for use of their name, image and likeness (NIL), subject to a per-school cap that would increase over time.
But the deal also would attempt to bring NIL payments under some enforceable rules, and Wilken said during the hearing she has issues with the proposed regulations, calling them "quite strict" and questioning whether they would end up in athletes losing access to payments they have been receiving from collectives.
"Taking things away from people doesn’t work well," she remarked.
Wilken also questioned the legality of a deal that, because of its length, stands to impact the rights of future athletes who are far from college age – "the 6-year-old playing kickball on the asphalt,” as she put it. She wondered who would represent future classes of incoming classes of athletes who would be largely bound by the proposed settlement, and whether it was appropriate for the current plaintiffs’ attorneys to do that without them facing significant a conflict of interest due to their connection to this proposed deal.
The NCAA said in a statement Thursday night: “The settlement agreement the NCAA and autonomy conferences submitted to the court was the product of hard-fought negotiations that would bring stability and sustainability to college sports … That continues to be our goal and the NCAA and autonomy conferences will carefully consider the court’s questions, which are not uncommon in the context of class action settlements.”
However, Thursday’s developments unsettled some in the major-college sports community – especially Wilken’s concern with the proposed regulatory process, which the NCAA considers to be critical to a settlement. Kilaru, the NCAA’s attorney, stressed that association’s position is that pay for play is prohibited under NCAA rules – and that prohibition has been upheld by various courts.
Under the settlement, athletes would have to report NIL payments of more than $600 to a clearinghouse that would be established. And their deals would be subject to review, with the goal being the prevention of pay for play and deals that pay amounts above market value.
Athletes who have questions about the permissibility of their agreements would be able to seek advisory opinion from an enforcement group. If the enforcement group sought to sanction an athlete because of a deal, the athlete would have the ability to bring the matter to an arbitrator.
Wilken’s concerns about this "is a potential killer," said a source familiar with the process who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the case. "I haven’t seen all of it yet, but it doesn’t sound good, that’s for sure."
Wilken raised questions with how a booster providing pay for play would be defined under the proposed setup.
"Today’s third-party donor" to a collective "is tomorrow’s booster. Now they can’t do it anymore …
"What if Mr. Fan gives them a million dollars or gives them all a truck. Is that a booster? I don’t know. Is that a collective? I don’t know. Is having a winning team a valid business purpose?"
On several occasions she jousted directly with Kilaru, the NCAA attorney.
Discussing the prospect of schools directly paying athletes amounts, at their discretion within the cap, for their NIL, Wilken asked Kilaru: "That wouldn’t be pay for play?"
Kilaru: "No, Your Honor."
Wilken ultimately said to all of the attorneys: "I turn this back on you all to" find something "workable, consistent … enforceable and fair."
Steve Berman, a lead attorney for the plaintiffs told USA TODAY Sports on Thursday night that Wilken having concerns is "not totally unexpected. … We’ll try to negotiate something. I don’t think it’s all that hard. … And it’s not in (the NCAA’s) interest to stick their heads in the sand and face the consequences of continued litigation."
Contributing: Matt Hayes, USA TODAY Network
veryGood! (566)
Related
- Stock market today: Asian stocks decline as China stimulus plan disappoints markets
- Simone Biles documentary director talks working with the GOAT, why she came back, more
- Maren Morris Reacts to Her NSFW Wardrobe Malfunction With Help From Cardi B and Megan Thee Stallion
- Diana Taurasi back from injury: How Mercury star fared in past two games
- Georgia State University is planning a $107M remake of downtown Atlanta
- Former Mozambique finance minister on trial in US over ‘tuna bond’ scandal that spurred debt crisis
- Emmy nomination snubs and shocks: No 'Frasier,' but hooray for Selena Gomez
- Why is 'The Bear' a comedy? FX show breaks record with Emmy nominations
- Japan to resume V-22 flights after inquiry finds pilot error caused accident
- Nearly two-thirds of Democrats want Biden to withdraw, new AP-NORC poll finds
Ranking
- Firefighters make progress, but Southern California wildfire rages on
- Halsey and Victorious Actor Avan Jogia Spark Engagement Rumors
- North Carolina Senate leader Berger names Ulm next chief of staff
- July 2024 full moon rises this weekend. But why is it called a 'buck moon'?
- My Chemical Romance returns with ‘The Black Parade’ tour
- The “greenhouse effect”: How an oft-touted climate solution threatens agricultural workers
- The Daily Money: Why women struggle with retirement saving
- John Stamos Jokes Son Billy's Latest Traumatic Milestone Sent Him to Therapy
Recommendation
-
New Jersey will issue a drought warning after driest October ever and as wildfires rage
-
Pro Football Hall of Famer Terrell Davis on being handcuffed and removed from a United flight: I felt powerless
-
100K+ Amazon Shoppers Bought This Viral Disposable Face Towel Last Month, & It's 30% Off for Prime Day
-
Why America's Next Top Model Alum Adrianne Curry Really Left Hollywood
-
Mississippi rising, Georgia falling in college football NCAA Re-Rank 1-134 after Week 11
-
Dick Van Dyke Addresses 46-Year Age Gap With Wife Arlene Silver
-
Six nights in 1984 at Pauley Pavilion where US gymnasts won crowds of fans and Olympic glory
-
Nikki Haley endorses Trump in show of unity at RNC