Current:Home > NewsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies-DB Wealth Institute B2 Expert Reviews
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View Date:2024-12-23 14:34:13
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (66295)
Related
- Mattel says it ‘deeply’ regrets misprint on ‘Wicked’ dolls packaging that links to porn site
- Time to start house hunting? Lower mortgage rates could save you hundreds
- Should postgame handshake be banned in kids' sports? No, it should be celebrated.
- From Biden to Gabbard, here’s what Harris’ past debates show before a faceoff with Trump
- Princess Kate makes rare public appearance after completing cancer chemo
- Disney's Goofy Character Isn't Actually a Dog—Or a Cow
- US surgeon general was warned by his mom to avoid politics, but he jumped into the fray anyway
- In Jordan Chiles' case, IOC has precedent to hand out two bronze medals
- Klay Thompson returns to Golden State in NBA Cup game. How to watch
- Legionnaires’ disease source may be contaminated water droplets near a resort, NH officials say
Ranking
- What is prize money for NBA Cup in-season tournament? Players get boost in 2024
- Crews begin demolishing Texas church where gunman killed more than two dozen in 2017
- Ryan Reynolds thanks Marvel for 'Deadpool & Wolverine' slams; Jude Law is a Jedi
- Breaking made history in Paris. We'll probably never see it at Olympics again.
- Gold is suddenly not so glittery after Trump’s White House victory
- When you 'stop running from it' and know you’ve outgrown your friend group
- Tragic 911 calls, body camera footage from Uvalde, Texas school shooting released
- Who won at the box office this weekend? The Reynolds-Lively household
Recommendation
-
Mean Girls’ Lacey Chabert Details “Full Circle” Reunion With Lindsay Lohan and Amanda Seyfried
-
Gypsy Rose Blanchard reveals sex of baby: 'The moment y’all have been waiting for'
-
Fatal weekend shootings jolt growing Denver-area suburb
-
Americans’ refusal to keep paying higher prices may be dealing a final blow to US inflation spike
-
Voters in California city reject measure allowing noncitizens to vote in local races
-
Early Harris-Walz rallies feature big crowds, talk of ‘joy’ and unsolicited GOP counterprogramming
-
Colorado finalizes new deal with Deion Sanders’ manager for filming on campus
-
Chiefs WR Marquise Brown ‘will miss some time’ after dislocating a clavicle in 26-13 loss at Jaguars